Skip to content

Blog Getting Started

More tasks, lower cost: Midpoint on g-harness-evals

Midpoint’s pre-release g-harness-evals run reached 90.0% on GPT-6.1 Sol and 83.8% on Claude Opus 5.5. Results, costs and limits.

Daniel Taratorin 1 min read

GPT-6.1 Sol chart comparing published g-harness-evals results with Midpoint’s own pre-release run: 90.0% pass rate at $0.13 per solved task.

A 90.0% pass rate. $0.13 per solved task.

That’s Midpoint running GPT-6.1 Sol in our November 9 test of a pre-release build on Garry Tan’s g-harness-evals, which compares how well different AI agent harnesses complete workplace tasks.

Animated benchmark chart. Midpoint: Opus 5.5, 83.8% pass rate at $0.23 per solved task; GPT-6.1 Sol, 90.0% at $0.13. Our pre-release run, November 9, 2026; other points are published g-harness-evals results.

Published g-harness-evals results alongside Midpoint’s own pre-release run, November 9, 2026. Higher is a better pass rate; further left is a lower cost per solved task.

With the same model, the published results range from 71.3% to 75.0%, at $0.17–$0.22 per solved task. Our run completed more tasks at a lower cost per success.

On Claude Opus 5.5, Midpoint reached 83.8% at $0.23 per solved task: a higher observed pass rate than the published Opus results, at a cost close to Claude Code and Hermes Agent.

More finished work for the same budget. That’s the direction we’re pushing Midpoint.

Hire one worker. Give it one job. Judge it on the work.

Your first worker is free for two weeks. No card.